The latest addition to the Hannagan clan: Mason Andrew Kellett, born on Saturday the 24th April. 7 lb 15 oz.
Mason is the grandchild of Jane (Hannagan) and John Kellett, and the son of Peter and Bex.
According to the Family Tree relationships graph, this makes him my mother's brother's daughter's son's son, which to me seems a rather long-winded way of putting it. He's my cousin's grandchild, would be a lot easier! I think it makes him something like my first cousin twice removed, but I'm not at all sure on that.
Here he is, presumably with his father...or maybe his grandfather...
Thursday, April 28, 2016
Wednesday, April 20, 2016
I come to a sudden halt...
I've just discovered that the next letter I have in the pile containing those I wrote from the UK to NZ in 1970 was written in December 1970. The ones following that are equally spasmodic. This doesn't mean I suddenly stopped writing; it just means that I probably have the letters written between March 1970 and December in another place. In fact, I've just hauled out a huge pile of letters from another part of the house: there may be a couple of hundred letters here. Not all of them were written by me to my mother; I've already found some from relatives and friends.
So my next task is to sort these into some sort of order. So far there have been several from the time when I toured around NZ with the NZ Opera Company. Plainly they'll have to be dealt with separately to the English ones.
I'll blog again when I've done the sort-out!
So my next task is to sort these into some sort of order. So far there have been several from the time when I toured around NZ with the NZ Opera Company. Plainly they'll have to be dealt with separately to the English ones.
I'll blog again when I've done the sort-out!
Tuesday, April 19, 2016
24.2.70 Mostly about the new job
This letter is out of order in these blog posts, but the list of blogs shows where it should fit.
24.2.70 [Typed on both sides of three and a half narrow and short, pale green, sheets of paper]
Dear Mum, I was all set to sit
down and write to you and discovered I seem to have run out of air letters, so
I hope the look of this didn’t shock you too much. Still no news from the CIB
which naturally enough I’m finding a bit distressing. The stage we’re at, at
the moment, is that of the girl making up her mind what she thinks of me from
the scanty information she has and the shocking photo. Obviously it’s a
difficult task! I can’t contact her personally at all until after she has
replied to the CIB to say she’ll have an ‘introduction arranged for her’ and
then they write to me again, and tell me I can write to her but still through
them ˗ Oh! What a complicated business! It’s only after she then replies
directly to me that either of us finds out who the other is and where they
live! The more I think about it the funnier it seems. I’m glad I went into that
like that because it’s shown me the funny side of it that I’d lost sight of. I
read a little CTS pamphlet the other day which had a quotation from a poem by Francis
Thompson (whom personally I don’t much care for but who seems in this case to
have come up with a very nice little saying). It was:
Is my gloom after all
Shade of His hand outstretched caressingly?
Shade of His hand outstretched caressingly?
which, once you’ve worked out the
slightly upside down grammar is rather to the point, though in our usual way we
manage to think God is mismanaging things for us instead of probably (quite
definitely!) the other way around.
I had Michael T and a girlfriend
of his, Mickey, and Kevin Rowlands up to lunch on Sunday afternoon, and though
Kevin bought a bottle of vino with him (I have bought one and so had Mike) he
doesn’t drink, and so we other three, possibly a little rudely, but....sat round
and drank off one bottle ˗ the other two can now wait for another party
sometime! He seems a pleasant sort of chap though not a conversationalist to
any degree which makes things a little difficult (and Mike wasn’t as co-operative
in this department as usual; he’s getting all introspective lately) but we all
survived, and he has returned the compliment and I’ll have to wend my way down
to his flat (with two other guys and four cats and three dogs!) sometime when
he calls to arrange a date. I hope he’s more at home in his own place. There’s
not much of the theatrical about him ˗ he strikes me as one of those totally theatre people whom you could
still pass on the street and barely notice. He’s tall, a little heavier than
that photo Mrs Leslie showed us, and generally quiet. And strangely enough
reminds me a lot of Kevin Flaherty. (Have you ever noticed how people of the
same name tend to have certain characteristics [in common]? Or am I just making that up to suit my argument? But even
in our family at home the various namesakes are all more than a little alike,
whether they would necessarily admit
it or not.) (Perhaps it’s just what we take from the name: when we meet someone
else of the same name as someone we already know we start to look for
similarities.)
Well, I started my new job
yesterday, with the worst nerves I’ve had in a long while; though it may also
have been the fact that I slept very badly the night before. I had thought I’d
grown over all that sort of thing, but it would appear not. I certainly wasn’t
the only one ˗ even our instructress, a Mrs Bullitt (would you believe?) seemed
nervous, which was rather nice. She’s nothing that her name might imply; it has
rather Dickensian overtones, and one imagines a gaunt upright severe person who
has a not a jot of patience with dunderheads. She is, however, a littler lady,
about 5’2” or 3” with a pleasant though tired expression and isn’t always quite
with what is going on, so that her smile tends to follow after the joke, and
after everyone else has laughed. She is inclined to not always quite say what
she means though generally the meaning is clear, and only needs verification. That
is the classroom Mrs Bullitt. The extra-tutorial Mrs B is even more pleasant,
not so tired, taller (?), and ever so slightly livelier. I hesitate to think
that it’s because she has been doing the job for a good while, but I suspect
that’s the case. She is probably in her late forties, though the classroom Mrs
Bullitt seems somewhat older.
Did I tell you that we have seven
weeks training before we’re let loose on the public? I think they have to have
us at some stage before that but I’m not sure. And we’re paid throughout ˗
though 2/- less for some reason, per week. We spend this time round Cannon St
or Wren House, which is opposite St Paul’s. So it’s an area I’ve not really spent
a great deal of time in before and it’s rather interesting. One of the other
men and myself went for a walk at lunchtime today and went over the London
Bridge where they are at present building a new one while the other is shipped,
stone
by stone, to America. The Tower is five minutes’ walk away, and it’s altogether
one of the older parts of London. I go to Liverpool St on a real train, not a
tube, from the station three minutes away (instead of ten or twenty as they
were before) and it’s 6d cheaper than before, and then walk for about seven
minutes down to Cannon St. One could go by the main roads from Liverpool St to
C. St, but fortunately the ancient residents of London beat pathways between
all these which still exist in the form of one-way alleyways, and by following about
four of these down, I save quite a bit of time. They all connect to each other
practically, so obviously I’m following in the footsteps of some old Londoner who
wasn’t bother to spend his time touring back and forth when he could go direct.
Our class has already dwindled
from eleven to eight in the first two days: two of them never arrived and one
middle-aged lady just didn’t come back today. The rest of the class consists of
two other men (thank God ˗ one poor bloke two weeks ahead of us got stuck by
himself in a class of women) (and spends his afternoon teas alone. He seems a
nice enough guy, though not bubbling with personality ˗ how cruel can women be?
And anyway I thought they were the predatory sex? What are they doing?) [More to the point, perhaps, what on earth am
I talking about?] one of whom is probably somewhere along the line of
Jewish extraction and is called Jerry Levi, and seems a not too bad guy,
married with a couple of kids, thin (don’t be fooled by the two cardigans, his
wife, I have no doubt, has made him wear under
his shirt) with a wide grin of a mouth, and a smoker’s ˗ a heavy smoker’s ˗
laugh. About 45, let’s say.
The other guy is Larry Boyles
(what a name, I ask you?) ˗ huge, weighs sixteen
stone, looks about 25 or so, but an Eastender, which means he has a certain
non-youthful characteristic. For example, he talks like an old man, seems to
find life just a little on the puzzling side, and never manages to hear what
you say in quite the way you say it, because like most Eastenders, he assumes
what you are going to say and gives the answer to that, when in fact you may have been a little more subtle. Perhaps
it’s me ˗ I don’t speak so good, maybe?
The women are two middle-aged
buddies (though I suspect they’d never met before yesterday), both divorcees-again-married, both the bright sparks of the company; a quality of their age
more than their personalities, since one who is married to an American
(previously to a Chinese!) and who has lived around the world for some years
has few of the qualities one associates with a well-travelled person, and the
other, who used to work at Scotland Yard (and who claimed she’d heard and seen
everything there ˗ I felt like telling here where I’d been for the last six
months!!) and who has been nicknamed Fuzz, seems only to be a cynic, and doesn’t
really the true appreciation of the funny side of life that makes a cynic
bearable.
There are two quite young girls
(one named Miss Weller, who, being an Eastender, reminds me irresistibly of Sam
Weller in Pickwick Papers) and a girl
of I suppose twenty-two or so, who is something like a beanstalk in a
mini-skirt, with glasses. But everybody is very friendly in that they return
your smiles and only laugh at you
because they’re glad they didn’t put their
foot in it.
The building is very hot in true
Civil Service style ˗ though as everybody is at pains to point out, the Post
Office is now a Corporation not a Govt. Dept., and I stopped wearing the
t-shirt that I had on under my shirt today in order to try and let a little air
in. I always thought that 60o was the sort of comfortable temperature but I’ve
seldom struck a place that is as cool as that. (The theatres here, particularly
the Opera Houses, are horribly hot in winter.)
About your [Bonus] Bond(s) ˗ I hope that you eventually get something out of
them ˗ it would be nice for you to be provided with a decent sort of ‘pension’
as it were for your old age. (I mean when you’re pushing one hundred or so!)
About the books: it seems that we’ve
nearly got everything sorted out again. Would it seem like very bad manners on
my part if sometime in the near future I made up another little list? You could
stop two or three of these postal orders you aren’t supposed to be sending me
to compensate, couldn’t you? It’s some odds and sods books which I’ll think
about; but one or two may come in handy for the teacher’s exam. Doris had a
friend of long-standing over here who died recently and left her all his music.
Perhaps I should say that he left me and some other pupils all his music, as
this is where it seems to be finally ending up. I have bought one lot from her
so far for a £1(quite how the economics work out I don’t know) which in fact
would have cost me a lot more, secondhand, to buy and even more new. About £10
at least. So I’m glad. And I’ve bought some other music off her that is old
stuff she no longer can use, for very minimal amounts, which will come in handy
for sightreading and perhaps teaching music.
Remember Margaret from work, at
the cinema? We had a huge chat on the last night, when she stayed right through
my working hours sitting just to talk. I’ve given her my phone number and she’s
already rung me once since ˗ and I told her she must come up for a meal,
because for a start she lives on her own. I don’t think there is any danger of
things getting involved ˗ I hope not;
perhaps I’m a bit thick where women are concerned, but from what she has said
(I’ve had a good deal of her history) it seems unlikely that she is interested
in me for any other reason than friendship. Friendship in the quite ordinary
sense. Oh dear, I hope things won’t be messy. No, I don’t think they will. What’s
this? [the last line ran downhill on the
page.] Love Mike.
[The last half page has a line across the top: Been trying to think what
to do with this]
14.3.70 An evening with Jerry
[A bit of a hiatus in terms of carrying on with blogging these old letters...tied up with music rehearsals and performances over the last several weeks.]
14.3.70 [two aerogrammes]
Rod, one of the flatmates, has a party on here tonight, so I don’t expect much sleep. I think I’ll go up to the laundrette actually! Lots of love, Mike.
I haven't been able to identify the two pubs mentioned in this post: I think the Christopher Wren may no longer exist, and perhaps the Spanish Bar is now a restaurant. But perhaps not....
14.3.70 [two aerogrammes]
Dear Mum, you’ll be glad to know
that the cold seems to have been dealt a blow on the head, in a way I hadn’t
quite anticipated: but at least it’s been gotten rid of. I explain how,
presently. [Actually I never get round to explaining why!]
You know, it seems to be one of my things in life (I remember
Margaret saying that everyone seems to have a particular thing: she says she
had never had to worry about money, for instance, it just appeared) to be picking up lame ducks and attempting some sort of
repair job; though it’s only in the last couple of years, or even less, that I’ve
really been reasonably capable of doing it. [That might have been overstating the case, I think.]
Remember Jimmy Wilson at school? He
must have been about the first. Well, you will recall that in my recent letters
when I talked about the PO class, I mentioned Jerry Levy? I’m afraid (no, not
afraid, but...I don’t know what the word would be) he’s my latest acquisition. He
has let drop the occasional hint of some unhappiness at home (he’s 38, has a
boy and a girl, and ‘a wife of independent means’ as he puts it) and quite
obviously doesn’t have a happy marriage. Anyway, yesterday after work, we
finished up at Wren House, getting our lockers etc in order for next week ˗ we
will work there in future (right next door to St Paul’s; what more inspiring
locale could you have?). Jerry, who normally rushes off, mentioned ultra-casually
that I might like to have a cup of coffee if I wasn’t pressed for time? I wasn’t,
and so we went to the nearest joint. One thing led to another and we finally
spent the whole evening together talking and drinking, and he finished up on
half of the bed at the flat here. I slept on the floor on the mattress part of
it ˗ quite comfortably; in fact, I suspect I was better off altogether.
It transpired in the coffee shop, after a
little prodding and coaxing from yours truly, that Jerry wasn’t going home that
night, again ˗ he’d spent the
previous night in some hotel ˗ and he suggested going and having a drink. He was
obviously not looking forward to spending the remainder of the evening on his
own, and so I said if I could have something to eat I’d have a drink or two. We
went to a place still nearby, in the newly-built St Paul’s Piazza or
whatever-it-is, and over the meal we got to talking and I got some more out of
him. To be fair, he did some prodding and prying of his own, which made me feel
less rude (rude? not the word either). But due to this conversation and the
ensuing very lengthy one in the St Christopher Wren, just round the corner (it
could be very old ˗ it could be very fake) we seemed to discover that we were
sort of soul-mates, to put it in an odd way. But do you know what I mean? When you
find that someone is quite content to be in your company and to talk and be
rude to you and laugh at your jokes and put with all your foibles (while also
pointing them out!) and you are equally content to be in his.
At that stage of the evening I hadn’t
really felt in the position of assisting his lame-duckness ˗ we were quite on a
par, friendship-wise, and just sitting around talking, keeping each other
alive. Jerry, it seems, has had a sort of recurring thing where he goes off and
leaves his wife ˗ or is told to go (I
think the latter often as not), and after a while they somehow come back to
each other, through some indefinable ‘x’ factor that holds marriages like his
together. On the last bout, he went off to Spain for two months until he was
forced to return because he couldn’t get any more work, and he doesn’t know how
long he’ll be away this time. He was off to find a bed-sit when I last saw him
today. It’s terrible, isn’t it? But it’s nice to know that the Good Lord looks
after everybody, really. This guy is so no particular believer, or any more
good than the next guy, but somehow or other our paths have crossed, and, last
night, at least I was able to fill a gap for him.
He’s mad on old films, too, and
for much of the time we just talked favourite film scenes. He was amazed that I’d
seen so many films that were made before I was born even, and at one stage
said, in a sort of grateful way to no one in particular, that he had to meet up
with some bloke from 12,000 miles away before he could talk on his own level
about a subject like this. It’s all rather incredible, isn’t it really?
I gave up thinking about going
home at any particular time in the end, and just let the evening go on
unplanned. One of the strangest things of the whole rather strange evening
however was when, after I’d been to the loo and had come up the stairs thinking
‘I wonder if he’d sooner come home to the flat and spend the night there;
(rather than spend it in a bleak hotel room in Kings Cross as he planned?) and
had practically decided that I couldn’t really ask him, he then turned round
and asked if he could kip down on the floor at my flat! Now, that is odd. I was
very glad he’d asked and naturally said, Yes.
Anyway, after we’d finished up at
the C Wren, he suggested going along to the Spanish Bar which is near Leicester
Square, just for a last drink, or some similar ridiculous excuse. So we went,
and eventually found ourselves in the hot and smoky and atmosphere-laden
basement bar: it was as phoney as a film set, and full of real Spaniards and phoney ones. Jerry was one of the
phoney ones! He has Spanish ancestry not very far back, and with that and
[second aerogramme]
the recent Spain trip, and the
fact that he is quite a linguist: (he
has German and French up his sleeve too) he was able to speak quite reasonable
Spanish to the people who would talk to him. Actually the atmosphere was quite
friendly, and people were talking on the most casual bases. But, for some crazy reason, he was
determined that he shouldn’t be an Englishman
for the night, and neither should I and I finally wound up being, at his
decision, a Norwegian! And the funniest thing was that we had a couple of
people on! A little Indo-European man and his Derbyshire girlfriend were the
victims ˗ Jerry’s victims I hasten to add; I barely said a word, though I rather
put my foot in it. I was not supposed to be able to speak English, and Jerry
and I were talking in awkward German as a sort of mutual language (I can’t
remember whether he was supposed to be a very linguistic Spaniard at this stage or
not) when the girl asked how long I’d been here, thinking no doubt it was
strange I hadn’t picked up any English. I said, like a fathead, in a mixture of
sort of bad German and bad English, 18 months, and she then said to Jerry,
assuming that I wouldn’t understand that it was a bit odd that I hadn’t learned
any English in that time ˗ how on earth did I get around? After that I shut up
and pretended to be a homesick Norwegian or something, and looked especially
gloomy, and Jerry carried on bantering them in Spanish and English and heaven
knows what! All extremely mad, and highly improbable, but never mind.
It got fairly late and we were
there till nearly closing time in the end. (They do have a sort of cabaret at
this place ˗ Spanish dancing and guitar-playing, done on an infinitesimally-raised
level, so that you to be six-foot tall to see; but since you don’t pay any
special price, this is what you must put with.)
Anyway, Jerry and I wended our way
to a bus and eventually got home. By this time he was starting to fall apart
quite a lot, which surprised me really, as he seems generally to have bags of
energy. We got home and he must have nearly gone berserk trying to figure out
who all the people were ˗ it was one of those nights when they all arrived one
after the other, and there seemed to be no end to the stream. So finally David
and I put him to be, as it were, and shut up shop. But he kept making me feel
as though I was making him a special guest of honour and showering him with
riches. I told him to shut up in the end, and he did, pretty well. But in fact I
wasn’t really treating him any better than I would have done if Mike had come
or someone like that.
To hark, way back, to the lame
duck bit; this seems to have come about late in the evening, when he lost some
of his verve, and I became sort of father to the child if you see what I mean. So
that’s the general picture of our Odyssey (the situation reminds me somewhat of
James Joyce’s Ulysses where a young
man and a middle-aged man become friendly over the space of one night).
Why do older people get on with me
at all? I ought to make them feel out of date or something, shouldn’t I, by the
law of the average statistical man? I think though, last night’s happening(s)
came about partly by my new policy of trying to be open (at the risk of getting
another mess) the same as I did with Margaret (who incidentally hasn’t yet been
any bother, and if I have room I may be able to explain why I think this is
so). And if it’s going to help somebody through an otherwise miserable and
lonely night, I’m glad to do it, because I’ve had the same sort of loneliness myself
at times. London is a terrible city for this, and I don’t intend to let it do
its damage to anyone if I can help it. (New Policy Ruling Number Four!)
Thanks for your comments on the
CIB (not CID, mother!) business. You’re
not being old-fashioned in what you say about the financial side of things,
though I must say I have the feeling that these days the girl herself
contributes more to the marriage that she might have done 20 or 30 years ago,
finance-wise. But I don’t rely on that. I must admit to feeling a little too
impoverished to even be contemplating such a thing as marriage, but since there
is not a great deal I can do about that at present, I can only save as much as
possible (more possible in this job ˗
though not when I’ve spent the night drinking!) and remember my promised daily
bread. And it does come. I don’t really get too uptight about money matters;
whenever I do, I think, This is ridiculous ˗ I’m ten times better off than a
lot of folk.
Jerry and I were discussing
marriage quite a lot last night actually, though not from this point of view,
and it would seem I’m pretty idealistic about certain aspects of it. But I don’t
think I’m foolish about it. I know marriage is bloomin’ hard work, and I think I’m
prepared for that.
So! What a funny letter. I hope
you don’t think I’m taking up with all sorts of odd people ˗ no, I’m sure you
don’t ˗ but helping them helps me,
and I’m one of the most incredibly selfish people around!
Rod, one of the flatmates, has a party on here tonight, so I don’t expect much sleep. I think I’ll go up to the laundrette actually! Lots of love, Mike.
I haven't been able to identify the two pubs mentioned in this post: I think the Christopher Wren may no longer exist, and perhaps the Spanish Bar is now a restaurant. But perhaps not....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)